Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Armando Vallina v. John Gluch, 86-1778 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 86-1778 Visitors: 67
Filed: May 29, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 819 F.2d 290 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Armando VALLINA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. John GLUCH, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-1778. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. May 29, 1987. Before KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Ci
More

819 F.2d 290

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Armando VALLINA, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
John GLUCH, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 86-1778.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 29, 1987.

Before KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This matter is before the court upon consideration of petitioner's appeal from the district court's judgment denying his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec.2241. The matter was referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the certified record and the parties' briefs, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

Petitioner alleged that the United States Parole Commission denied him due process by relying on inaccurate and insufficient evidence to impose a presumptive parole date which exceeded the guidelines for his offense.

3

Upon consideration, this court concludes that the district court's judgment must be affirmed for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion dated August 11, 1986. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer