Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

William Earl Griffin v. Larry S. Buege, William Bruce Jarvis, Stephen Lerile, and Robert J. Laforest, 86-1868 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 86-1868 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 20, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 815 F.2d 77 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. William Earl GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry S. BUEGE, William Bruce Jarvis, Stephen Lerile, and Robert J. Laforest, Defendants-Appellees. No. 86-1868. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Feb.
More

815 F.2d 77

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
William Earl GRIFFIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry S. BUEGE, William Bruce Jarvis, Stephen Lerile, and
Robert J. Laforest, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1868.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 20, 1987.

Before MARTIN and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This appeal has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After examination of the record and appellant's informal brief, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

It is concluded upon a careful review of the district court record that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of appellees and dismissed appellant's civil rights complaint. The material facts, read in a light most favorable to plaintiff, cannot support a cause of action under the civil rights act. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).

3

Therefore, for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, the judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(d)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer