Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

86-5642 (1987)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 86-5642 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 30, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 822 F.2d 60 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. In re Q.F.I., INC., d/b/a and a/k/a Royal Food, Inc.; Royal Food Enterprises, Inc.; Royal Enterprises; Royal Foods and Royal Foods, Inc., formerly doing business and formerly known as Turner's Foodline, Inc. an
More

822 F.2d 60

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
In re Q.F.I., INC., d/b/a and a/k/a Royal Food, Inc.; Royal
Food Enterprises, Inc.; Royal Enterprises; Royal Foods and
Royal Foods, Inc., formerly doing business and formerly
known as Turner's Foodline, Inc. and Turner Foodline, Inc., Debtor,
FLEMING FOOD, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas and Howard of Hickory, Inc.; Merchants Distributors,
Inc.; and American Bakeries Company;. Union
Planters National Bank; L. B. Turner,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-5642

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 30, 1987.

Before KEITH and NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the order of the Honorable James H. Jarvis granting appellees' motion to dismiss the appellant's earlier appeal of an order of the Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Tennessee. The order of the Bankruptcy Court denied appellant's motion to strike certain names from the caption of an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. After careful review of the record, oral argument and the briefs of the parties, we DISMISS the appeal on the ground that the order initially appealed from is not a final, appealable order.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer