Filed: Aug. 10, 1987
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 826 F.2d 1064 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Dennis Lee MAXBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERITRUST BANK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-3326 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1987. ORDER Before KENNEDY, MILBURN and NORRIS, Circuit Ju
Summary: 826 F.2d 1064 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Dennis Lee MAXBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERITRUST BANK, Defendant-Appellee. No. 87-3326 United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Aug. 10, 1987. ORDER Before KENNEDY, MILBURN and NORRIS, Circuit Jud..
More
826 F.2d 1064
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Dennis Lee MAXBERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
AMERITRUST BANK, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-3326
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Aug. 10, 1987.
ORDER
Before KENNEDY, MILBURN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
1
This pro se plaintiff seeks review of a judgment of the district court which dismissed his civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Upon examination of the record and plaintiff's brief, the panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
2
For the reasons stated in the district court's order, its final judgment entered March 18, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.