Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

John Alfred Duncombe, II v. James P. Murphy, and Ronald Shoemate, Charles Ellis, John Harkness, Kirk M. Kandle, 87-1646 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-1646 Visitors: 42
Filed: Mar. 31, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 848 F.2d 190 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. John Alfred DUNCOMBE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James P. MURPHY, and Ronald Shoemate, Defendants-Appellees, Charles Ellis, John Harkness, Kirk M. Kandle, Defendants. No. 87-1646. United States Court of Appea
More

848 F.2d 190

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
John Alfred DUNCOMBE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James P. MURPHY, and Ronald Shoemate, Defendants-Appellees,
Charles Ellis, John Harkness, Kirk M. Kandle, Defendants.

No. 87-1646.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 31, 1988.

Before KEITH, BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Plaintiff appeals the district court's judgment dismissing his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983, 1985(3) and 1986. The appeal has been referred to a panel pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon consideration of the certified record and the parties' briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

2

Plaintiff claimed the defendants conspired to deprive him of his liberty interest in keeping his prison job without procedural due process due to race discrimination.

3

Upon consideration, we affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons stated in the order filed June 16, 1987. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer