Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

87-2056 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 87-2056 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 28, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 865 F.2d 256 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. James J. CARRAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph R. McDONALD, Eugene C. Penzien, Circuit Judges in individual and official capacities; James Andrezejewski; David F. Oeming, Jr.; Robert D. Kinsey, Jr.; Stan Bake
More

865 F.2d 256

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
James J. CARRAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joseph R. McDONALD, Eugene C. Penzien, Circuit Judges in
individual and official capacities; James Andrezejewski;
David F. Oeming, Jr.; Robert D. Kinsey, Jr.; Stan Baker;
Ray Priddy; Ann Priddy; Fred Hayes; Ron Stevens d/b/a
Stevens Farm; Thomas Chisholm; and Vida Randall,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-2056.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1988.

Before KEITH and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Plaintiff James J. Carras appeals from the order of the district court dismissing his action brought under 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, 1985 (2), 1985 (3), 1986, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1964. Plaintiff's action was dismissed for failure to state a claim. Carras v. Williams, et al., No. 83-CV-7402-BC, slip op. (E.D.Mich. Sept. 14, 1987).

2

After careful consideration of the record, the briefs submitted, and the arguments of counsel, we find no error in the opinion and order of the Honorable James R. Churchill, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

3

Accordingly, we hereby AFFIRM based on the district court's opinion and order entered September 14, 1987.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer