Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Phil Gutter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 88-1313 (1988)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 88-1313 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 19, 1988
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 865 F.2d 258 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Phil GUTTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 88-1313. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 19, 1988. 1 Before MILBURN and DAVID A. NELSON, Cir
More

865 F.2d 258

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Phil GUTTER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 88-1313.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1988.

1

Before MILBURN and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD F. SUHRHEINRICH, District Judge.*

ORDER

2

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Petitioner initiated this action in the Tax Court to contest the propriety of a notice of income tax deficiency. The sole dispute presented to the Tax Court was whether or not the petitioner was entitled to carry over a deduction for excess charitable contributions made in 1973 to the 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1984 tax years. The Tax Court concluded that pursuant to I.R.C. Sec. 170(d)(1)(A), the deductions were not allowable since they were not taken during the five years succeeding the initial 1973 contribution. Accordingly, the Tax Court entered a judgment assessing taxes and penalties upon the petitioner.

4

On appeal, petitioner seeks appointment of "amicus" counsel. Upon review, we affirm. I.R.C. Sec. 170(d)(1)(A) clearly provides that excess charitable contribution deductions may be carried over for no more than five years immediately following the year in which the contribution is made. Petitioner's reliance on the alleged ambiguity of IRS Publication 526 is misplaced. The only version of Publication 526 that is quoted in the record tells the taxpayer that if his contributions exceed the limit in the year when made, he "may deduct the excess in each of the five succeeding years until it is used up...." (Emphasis supplied.) This tracks the language of the statute, and does not suggest that any deduction may be taken except in one of "the" five succeeding years. Informal publications do not bind the government in any event, and a taxpayer who relies on them does so at his own peril. See Gehl Co. v. Commissioner, 795 F.2d 1324, 1333 (7th Cir.1986); CWT Farms, Inc. v. Commissioner, 755 F.2d 790, 803 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 903 (1986).

5

Accordingly, petitioner's motion for appointment of "amicus" counsel is denied and the Tax Court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Richard F. Suhrheinrich, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer