Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Darrol R. Church v. Whirlpool Corporation, 89-3247 (1989)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 89-3247 Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 12, 1989
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 891 F.2d 289 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Darrol R. CHURCH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-3247. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 12, 1989. Before KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BRO
More

891 F.2d 289

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Darrol R. CHURCH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 89-3247.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1989.

Before KEITH and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

Plaintiffs appeal from the Order of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant.

2

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning set forth in the district court's Opinion and Order of February 28, 1989.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer