Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

89-5085 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 89-5085 Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 18, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 914 F.2d 257 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Elizabeth Ann POTTS, individually and as next of kin of Harold Lamar Potts, Deceased, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents. No. 89-5085. United States Court of Appea
More

914 F.2d 257

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Elizabeth Ann POTTS, individually and as next of kin of
Harold Lamar Potts, Deceased, Plaintiff-Petitioner,
v.
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents.

No. 89-5085.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 18, 1990.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

1

Pursuant to the published opinion of the Tennessee Supreme Court filed on September 10, 1990, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer