Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

90-6426 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 90-6426 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 30, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 919 F.2d 142 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. David M. WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant, Warren County Independent Political Council, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Tom HART; Valarie Kinder; Linda Thomas; Buddy Adams; David Broderick; Craig Eva
More

919 F.2d 142

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
David M. WEST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
Warren County Independent Political Council, and all others
similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
Tom HART; Valarie Kinder; Linda Thomas; Buddy Adams;
David Broderick; Craig Evans; William Hatcher; Velma
Koostra; John Parker; Wayne Priest; David Sowder; Ron
Whitlock; Craig Taylor; William Jenkins; Oscar Claypool;
Fred Ragland, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6426.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 30, 1990.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., and NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judges; and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

2

A review of the documents before the court indicates that appellant appealed on November 8, 1990, from the November 2, 1990, order denying a temporary restraining order. Such an order is not appealable. Bailey v. Systems Innovation, Inc., 852 F.2d 93, 96 (3d Cir.1988); Manbourne, Inc. v. Conrad, 796 F.2d 884, 887 n. 3 (7th Cir.1986); United States v. Crusco, 464 F.2d 1060, 1062 (3d Cir.1972) (per curiam); Leslie v. Penn Cent. R.R. Co., 410 F.2d 750, 751 (6th Cir.1969) (per curiam).

3

It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer