Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard C. Nicholson v. Samuel K. Skinner, 91-2205 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 91-2205 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 02, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 952 F.2d 1397 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Richard C. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel K. SKINNER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-2205. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1991. Before DAVID A. NELSON and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; and CELEBREZZE,
More

952 F.2d 1397

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Richard C. NICHOLSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Samuel K. SKINNER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2205.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 2, 1991.

Before DAVID A. NELSON and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges; and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

The plaintiff appeals an order granting partial summary judgment for the defendant in this action to compel enforcement of an agency decision. The district court advises that the plaintiff has claims which are still pending in the district court.

2

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, courts of appeals have jurisdiction only over final decisions of the district court. A judgment is final if it leaves nothing remaining for the district court to do except execute final judgment. Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945). See Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company, 475 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam). Absent certification for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) or Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., an order disposing of fewer than all parties or claims in an action is nonappealable. William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101, 102 (6th Cir.1978) (per curiam). Upon review and consideration the court concludes that the plaintiff's appeal must be dismissed.

3

It is therefore ORDERED the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed sua sponte for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Local Rules of the Sixth Circuit. This order is without prejudice to the plaintiff's right to perfect a timely appeal upon entry of final judgment in the district court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer