Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Miami County Municipal Court State of Ohio William E. Kessler v. Charles E. Wright, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper, No, 880 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 880 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 30, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 963 F.2d 880 MIAMI COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT; STATE of Ohio; William E. Kessler, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Charles E. WRIGHT, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper, Defendant-Appellant. No. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. July 30, 1992. 1 MERRITT, C.J.; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER Circuit Judges. 2 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc.
More

963 F.2d 880

MIAMI COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT; STATE of Ohio; William E.
Kessler, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Charles E. WRIGHT, Ohio State Highway Patrol Trooper,
Defendant-Appellant.
No.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

July 30, 1992.

1

MERRITT, C.J.; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER Circuit Judges.

2

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 as follows:

3

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

4

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

5

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer