Filed: Dec. 02, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 34 F.3d 368 Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Respondents. Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1994. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Cir
Summary: 34 F.3d 368 Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Respondents. Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Dec. 2, 1994. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circ..
More
34 F.3d 368
Andrew BARTLIK, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; TENNESSEE VALLEY
AUTHORITY, Respondents.
Nos. 93-3616, 93-3834.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1994.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
2
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
3
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
4
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
