Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kenneth Wayne O'guinn, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Michael Dutton, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee, 93-5578 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 93-5578 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 10, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 42 F.3d 359 Kenneth Wayne O'GUINN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Michael DUTTON, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Nos. 93-5578, 93-5620. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 10, 1995. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Six
More

42 F.3d 359

Kenneth Wayne O'GUINN, Petitioner-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Michael DUTTON, Respondent-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 93-5578, 93-5620.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 10, 1995.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer