Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. David W. Lanier, 93-5608 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 93-5608 Visitors: 42
Filed: Jan. 04, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 43 F.3d 1033 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David W. LANIER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-5608. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Jan. 4, 1995. Prior Report: 33 F.3d 639 . Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit R
More

43 F.3d 1033

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David W. LANIER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-5608.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1995.

Prior Report: 33 F.3d 639.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer