Filed: Mar. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 50 F.3d 11 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Plaintiff-Appellee, Toshia Mundy; William Mays; Tammie Latham, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. Arthur SCHREIBER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-3144. United States Court of
Summary: 50 F.3d 11 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Plaintiff-Appellee, Toshia Mundy; William Mays; Tammie Latham, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, v. Arthur SCHREIBER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-3144. United States Court of ..
More
50 F.3d 11
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Toshia Mundy; William Mays; Tammie Latham, Plaintiffs-Intervenors,
v.
Arthur SCHREIBER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-3144.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 14, 1995.
Before: LIVELY, RYAN and DAUGHTREY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
2
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
