Filed: Apr. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 52 F.3d 325 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Stephen J. JACOBS; Kathleen B. Jacobs, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. SMYTHE, CRAMER, INC., Realtors; Lucius B. McKelvey, President, Smythe, Cramer, Inc., Realtors; David C. Paul, Principal Broker; Kay Murray, individually and as represent
Summary: 52 F.3d 325 NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Stephen J. JACOBS; Kathleen B. Jacobs, Plaintiffs-Appellants. v. SMYTHE, CRAMER, INC., Realtors; Lucius B. McKelvey, President, Smythe, Cramer, Inc., Realtors; David C. Paul, Principal Broker; Kay Murray, individually and as representa..
More
52 F.3d 325
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Stephen J. JACOBS; Kathleen B. Jacobs, Plaintiffs-Appellants.
v.
SMYTHE, CRAMER, INC., Realtors; Lucius B. McKelvey,
President, Smythe, Cramer, Inc., Realtors; David C. Paul,
Principal Broker; Kay Murray, individually and as
representative of a class of certain independent
contractor/real estate agent associates of Smythe, Cramer
Co., Realtors, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-3299.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 14, 1995.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; LIVELY and KEITH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
2
It is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, affirmed upon the opinion of the district court.
