Filed: Jul. 21, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 146 F.3d 1051 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-1823. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit July 21, 1998. Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as foll
Summary: 146 F.3d 1051 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Reginald COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-1823. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit July 21, 1998. Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follo..
More
146 F.3d 1051
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Reginald COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-1823.
United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit
July 21, 1998.
Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
2
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
3
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
4
It is further ORDERED that the parties file simultaneous supplemental briefs not later than Thursday, August 20, 1998.
5
The Clerk will schedule this case for argument as directed by the court.
