Filed: Oct. 17, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 270 F.3d 297 (6th Cir. 2001) LYNETTE CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE HIGBEE COMPANY, DOING BUSINESS AS DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-3970 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT October 17, 2001 BEFORE: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a)
Summary: 270 F.3d 297 (6th Cir. 2001) LYNETTE CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE HIGBEE COMPANY, DOING BUSINESS AS DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-3970 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT October 17, 2001 BEFORE: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) ..
More
270 F.3d 297 (6th Cir. 2001)
LYNETTE CHAPMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE HIGBEE COMPANY, DOING BUSINESS AS DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
No. 99-3970
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
October 17, 2001
BEFORE: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
1
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
2
"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."
3
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
4
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the Court.
