Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Sean Carter, 01-5338 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 01-5338 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 315 F.3d 651 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean CARTER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-5338. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. February 24, 2003. Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Pursuant to Sixth Cicuit I.O.P. 35(c), a majority of the Judges of the Court in regular active service have voted to grant the request of a member of the Court for rehearing of this case en banc.
More

315 F.3d 651

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Sean CARTER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-5338.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 24, 2003.

Before MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Pursuant to Sixth Cicuit I.O.P. 35(c), a majority of the Judges of the Court in regular active service have voted to grant the request of a member of the Court for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

2

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

It is further ORDERED that the parties simultaneously file supplemental briefs not later than Monday, March 24, 2003.

5

The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the Court.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer