Filed: Apr. 06, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0262n.06 Filed: April 6, 2005 No. 04-5319 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT F. CHRIS CAWOOD, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE Plaintiff-Appellant, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN v. ) DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) LINDA BOOTH; JON FRENCH; RANDY ) MEMORANDUM SCARBROUGH; and DENNIS WORLEY, ) OPINION ) Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) BEFORE: NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and Mills, District Judge. * PER CURIAM. F. Chri
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0262n.06 Filed: April 6, 2005 No. 04-5319 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT F. CHRIS CAWOOD, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE Plaintiff-Appellant, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN v. ) DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) LINDA BOOTH; JON FRENCH; RANDY ) MEMORANDUM SCARBROUGH; and DENNIS WORLEY, ) OPINION ) Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) BEFORE: NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and Mills, District Judge. * PER CURIAM. F. Chris..
More
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 05a0262n.06
Filed: April 6, 2005
No. 04-5319
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
F. CHRIS CAWOOD, )
) ON APPEAL FROM THE
Plaintiff-Appellant, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT
) COURT FOR THE EASTERN
v. ) DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
)
LINDA BOOTH; JON FRENCH; RANDY ) MEMORANDUM
SCARBROUGH; and DENNIS WORLEY, ) OPINION
)
Defendants-Appellees. )
)
)
BEFORE: NORRIS and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges; and Mills, District Judge. *
PER CURIAM. F. Chris Cawood appeals the district court’s decision to grant summary
judgment to defendants, in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable
law, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to defendants.
Because the reasoning which supports judgment for defendants has been articulated by the
district court, the issuance of a detailed written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve
no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning
employed by that court in its opinion, Cawood v. Haggard,
327 F. Supp. 2d 863 (E.D. Tenn, 2004).
*
The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Court Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by
designation.
No. 04-5319
Caewood v. Haggard
-2-