Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wirt v. Ticona Polymers Inc, 07-1016 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Number: 07-1016 Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 24, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0689n.06 Filed: September 24, 2007 NO. 07-1016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GARY WIRT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR v. ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ) MICHIGAN TICONA POLYMERS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants-Appellees. ) Before: CLAYand GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, Chief District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Gary Wirt and Quantum Technologies, Inc., appe
More
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 07a0689n.06 Filed: September 24, 2007 NO. 07-1016 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GARY WIRT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR v. ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ) MICHIGAN TICONA POLYMERS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants-Appellees. ) Before: CLAYand GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; and HOOD, Chief District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs Gary Wirt and Quantum Technologies, Inc., appeal the decision of the district court dismissing their breach of contract claims against Defendant Ticona Polymers, Inc., and its predecessor-in-interest, Celanese Corporation. Having reviewed the record and the applicable law and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and AFFIRM the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. *The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer