Filed: Jul. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 11a0491n.06 No. 09-2440 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jul 18, 2011 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, LEONARD GREEN, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN fka Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendants, and BRIAN KEITH MENEFEE, by his guar
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 11a0491n.06 No. 09-2440 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jul 18, 2011 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, LEONARD GREEN, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN fka Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS); DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendants, and BRIAN KEITH MENEFEE, by his guard..
More
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 11a0491n.06
No. 09-2440
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
FILED
Jul 18, 2011
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
LEONARD GREEN, Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
TRICARE MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY, WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
fka Office of Civilian Health and Medical
Programs of the Uniformed Services
(CHAMPUS); DEPARTMENT OF THE
AIR FORCE,
Defendants,
and
BRIAN KEITH MENEFEE, by his guardian Rita
Callen; JOHN D. TALLMAN, individually;
JOHN D. TALLMAN, PLC,
Defendants-Appellants.
/
BEFORE: SUTTON and WHITE, Circuit Judges; and STAFFORD, District Judge.*
PER CURIAM.
Brian K. Menefee ("Menefee"), John D. Tallman, and John D. Tallman, PLC, appeal the
district court's denial of their motion for sanctions against Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate").
We AFFIRM.
*
The Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.
No. 09-2440
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Tricare Mgmt. Activity
I.
Because the parties and their counsel are familiar with the facts and convoluted history of this
case, those facts and history need not be recounted at length in this unpublished opinion. Instead,
a brief overview will suffice.
In 2002, while home on leave from service in the United States Air Force, Menefee suffered
disabling injuries in an automobile accident. For a time following the accident, Menefee was an
inpatient in a Spectrum Health facility ("Spectrum") where he generated expenses totaling
$151,586.37.
Menefee had two potential sources of coverage for the medical expenses incurred: (1)
Allstate and (2) TRICARE, a federal government program that offers medical insurance to members
of the military when no other coverage is available. By law, TRICARE is a carrier of last resort.
After Allstate denied coverage, Spectrum billed TRICARE for Menefee's treatment.
Pursuant to regulatory cost-containment provisions to which Spectrum was bound, TRICARE paid
Spectrum $78,809.29, representing payment in full of Spectrum's total bill of $151,586.37. As a
carrier of last resort, TRICARE was entitled to reimbursement of the $78,809.29 by Spectrum if
Spectrum later received payment from Allstate.
Menefee's mother, as Menefee's court-appointed guardian, hired John D. Tallman, of the John
D. Tallman, PLC, law firm (collectively, "Tallman"), to sue Allstate in state court, alleging that
Allstate was primarily responsible for payment of Menefee's expenses and seeking recovery, inter
alia, of Spectrum's bill totaling $151,586.37. Spectrum sought to protect its entitlement to full
-2-
No. 09-2440
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Tricare Mgmt. Activity
payment from Allstate by seeking to intervene in the case. The trial judge denied Spectrum's motion
to intervene, explaining that "there is an adequate representation [by Tallman] of the interest at hand,
namely to get enough money into Mr. Menefee's pockets to pay the bill that presumably is
outstanding to [Spectrum]."
After the coverage issue was decided adversely to Allstate, the trial judge entered a partial
judgment in favor of Menefee, awarding attorney's fees in the amount of $30,800.50 and stating that
"[Allstate] shall pay [Menefee] $151,586.57, reflecting charges owed to Spectrum Health." Allstate
thereafter delivered a check in the amount of $182,167.87 to Tallman, who—after subtracting
costs—released $114,484.77 to Menefee, keeping $60,000 for himself as an attorney's fee. None
of the money was paid to Spectrum.
Allstate later received and paid the government's claim for reimbursement of more than
$400,000 in benefits paid by TRICARE for Menefee's post-accident treatment and rehabilitation.
The $78,809.29 paid by TRICARE to Spectrum was included both in the government's claim and
in Allstate's check to Menefee. Because Allstate had already paid—through satisfaction of the partial
judgment—the entire amount owed to Spectrum, the payment of $78,809.29 to the government for
reimbursement to TRICARE was duplicative.
Upon discovery of the double payment, Allstate attempted to resolve the matter informally
with Tallman. When such attempts proved unsuccessful, Allstate filed the instant suit against
TRICARE and the United States Air Force, seeking recovery of the $78,809.29 it had twice paid
toward the Spectrum bill. Allstate later joined Menefee and Tallman, who filed motions for
-3-
No. 09-2440
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Tricare Mgmt. Activity
summary judgment, to dismiss, and for sanctions against Allstate.1 The district court granted
Menefee's and Tallman's motion for summary judgment, explaining—inter alia—that "equity cannot
intervene to save Allstate from the consequences of multiple mistakes of its own making." At the
same time, the district court denied Menefee's and Tallman's motion for sanctions, rejecting their
claim that Allstate's lawsuit was brought for an improper purpose.
II.
Menefee and Tallman now appeal the district court's denial of sanctions, a decision we
review under the highly deferential abuse-of-discretion standard. See Merritt v. Int'l Ass'n of
Machinists and Aerospace Workers,
613 F.3d 609, 626 (6th Cir. 2011). We conclude that the district
court clearly acted within the broad scope of its discretion given the record in this case. As the
district court well explained in its thorough twenty-one page opinion, Allstate's claims were not
sanctionable even if ultimately unsuccessful. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
1
The district court granted a motion to dismiss filed by TRICARE and the Air Force,
dismissing those two defendants for lack of jurisdiction. That decision is not before us.
-4-