Filed: Jan. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 18a0031n.06 Case No. 17-3414 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jan 17, 2018 ERIC MELOY, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF SHAWN CHETTO; MATTHEW BEECH; ) OHIO JOHN DOES, Individually and as employees ) of the Akron Police Department; JAMES ) NICE, Individually and as Chief of Police; ) CITY OF AKRON, ) ) Defendants-Appe
Summary: NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 18a0031n.06 Case No. 17-3414 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Jan 17, 2018 ERIC MELOY, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF SHAWN CHETTO; MATTHEW BEECH; ) OHIO JOHN DOES, Individually and as employees ) of the Akron Police Department; JAMES ) NICE, Individually and as Chief of Police; ) CITY OF AKRON, ) ) Defendants-Appel..
More
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION
File Name: 18a0031n.06
Case No. 17-3414
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
FILED
Jan 17, 2018
ERIC MELOY, )
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
)
Plaintiff-Appellant, )
) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED
v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
) THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
SHAWN CHETTO; MATTHEW BEECH; ) OHIO
JOHN DOES, Individually and as employees )
of the Akron Police Department; JAMES )
NICE, Individually and as Chief of Police; )
CITY OF AKRON, )
)
Defendants-Appellees. )
BEFORE: GUY, GIBBONS, and COOK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM. Eric Meloy’s appeal challenges the district court’s grant of summary
judgment with respect to his claim that Officer Chetto used excessive force against him in
violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After review of the record, the applicable law, and the arguments
presented on appeal, we are convinced that the district court correctly set out the facts and
governing law and did not err in concluding that qualified immunity barred this claim.
Concluding that the issuance of a detailed opinion would be duplicative, we AFFIRM for the
reasons stated in the district court’s Opinion and Order entered on April 18, 2017. See Meloy v.
Akron Police Dep’t, No. 5:15-CV-01123,
2017 WL 1387170 (N.D. Ohio Apr. 18, 2017).