Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Elmer Britton v. South Bend Community School Corporation, 84-2841 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 84-2841 Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 12, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 783 F.2d 105 41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1104 , 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,142, 30 Ed. Law Rep. 45 Elmer BRITTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 84-2841. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Feb. 12, 1986. Before CUMMINGS, Chief Judge, and BAUER, WOOD, CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc f
More

783 F.2d 105

41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1104,
40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,142, 30 Ed. Law Rep. 45

Elmer BRITTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SOUTH BEND COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 84-2841.

United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 12, 1986.

Before CUMMINGS, Chief Judge, and BAUER, WOOD, CUDAHY, POSNER, COFFEY, FLAUM and EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

On consideration of the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc filed by counsel for the plaintiffs-appellants in the above-entitled cause, and the response therein filed by counsel for the defendants-appellees, a vote of the active members of the court having been requested, and a majority* of the judges in regular active service having voted to rehear this case en banc,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the aforesaid petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc be, and the same is, GRANTED.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the panel opinion and judgment entered October 21, 1985 are hereby VACATED, and that this case will be reheard en banc at the convenience of the Court.

*

The Honorable Kenneth F. Ripple, an active member of the Court did not participate in consideration of the petition for rehearing en banc

The Honorable Thomas E. Fairchild was a member of the original panel, but he did not participate in the vote on suggestion for rehearing en banc.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer