Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thomas E. Hauert v. United States, 95-3532 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 95-3532 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 01, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 89 F.3d 838 NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit. Thomas E. HAUERT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-3532. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 1, 1996. Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and MANION and KANNE, Circuit Ju
More

89 F.3d 838

NOTICE: Seventh Circuit Rule 53(b)(2) states unpublished orders shall not be cited or used as precedent except to support a claim of res judicata, collateral estoppel or law of the case in any federal court within the circuit.
Thomas E. HAUERT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-3532.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 1996.*
Decided May 1, 1996.

Before POSNER, Chief Judge, and MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Thomas Hauert brought this motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking relief from his sentence for failing to file federal income-tax returns for the years 1988 through 1991, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 7201, 7203.

2

For the reasons given by the district court in its order, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary in this case; accordingly, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Cir.R. 34(f)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer