Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 09, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 9, 2006 Before Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 03-4075 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 02 CR 418 WILLIAM R. KAPP, Defendant-Appellant. Blanche M. Manning, Judge.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 9, 2006 Before Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 03-4075 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 02 CR 418 WILLIAM R. KAPP, Defendant-Appellant. Blanche M. Manning, Judge. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
June 9, 2006
Before
Hon. MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
No. 03-4075
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States
Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
v.
No. 02 CR 418
WILLIAM R. KAPP,
Defendant-Appellant. Blanche M. Manning,
Judge.
ORDER
Kapp was sentenced to 51 months’ imprisonment for violations of the
Endangered Species Act and the Lacey Act. On appeal, Kapp argued, among other
things, that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. See United States v.
Booker,
543 U.S. 220 (2005); United States v. Paladino,
401 F.3d 471, 481 (7th Cir.
2005). We remanded to ask whether the judge would have imposed a lesser
sentence had she known that the guidelines were advisory. See
Paladino, 401 F.3d
at 483–84. The judge answered that she would have imposed the same sentence.
Because that sentence fell within the correctly calculated guidelines range, it is
presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Mykytiuk,
415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th
Cir. 2005). Kapp filed no response before us to rebut that presumption and our
independent review uncovers nothing to suggest unreasonableness. Therefore, in
addition to his convictions, Kapp’s sentence is also AFFIRMED.