Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jun. 30, 2006
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 30, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 04-1786 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division v. No. 02 CR 1129 LAVAR HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Joan B. Gottschall, Judge
Summary: UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 June 30, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 04-1786 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division v. No. 02 CR 1129 LAVAR HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant. Joan B. Gottschall, Judge...
More
UNPUBLISHED ORDER
Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
June 30, 2006
Before
Hon. RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge
Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge
No. 04-1786
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District
Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division
v.
No. 02 CR 1129
LAVAR HARRIS,
Defendant-Appellant. Joan B. Gottschall,
Judge.
ORDER
After we ordered a limited remand, see United States v. Booker,
543 U.S. 220
(2005); United States v. Paladino,
401 F.3d 471, 484 (7th Cir. 2003), the district
judge informed us that she would have imposed the same sentence on Lavar Harris
had she known the sentencing guidelines were advisory. Because that sentence is
within the properly calculated guidelines range, it is presumptively reasonable.
United States v. Mykytiuk,
415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir. 2005). Harris contends that
Mykytiuk was wrongly decided, but does not identify any basis under the factors
outlined in 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a) to question the reasonableness of his sentence. Our
independent review uncovers nothing to suggest unreasonableness, therefore the
judgment is AFFIRMED.