Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Apr. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 6, 2007 Before Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 01-1772 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. v. No. 98 CR 104 LARRY OLSON, also known as OREO, Lynn Adel
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 6, 2007 Before Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge No. 01-1772 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. v. No. 98 CR 104 LARRY OLSON, also known as OREO, Lynn Adelm..
More
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION
To be cited only in accordance with
Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
United States Court of Appeals
For the Seventh Circuit
Chicago, Illinois 60604
April 6, 2007
Before
Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge
Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge
Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
No. 01-1772
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States
Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Eastern
District of Wisconsin.
v.
No. 98 CR 104
LARRY OLSON, also known
as OREO, Lynn Adelman,
Defendant-Appellant. Judge.
ORDER
Larry Olson appealed his conviction and sentence for racketeering and drug conspiracy
charges. We affirmed his conviction, United States v. Olson,
450 F.3d 655 (7th Cir. 2006), and
ordered a limited remand to ask whether the district court would have imposed the same sentence
under an advisory regime. United States v. Paladino,
401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir. 2005), cert.
denied,
126 S. Ct. 1343 (2006). The district court has now indicated that it would likely impose a
different sentence in light of the additional discretion afforded by United States v. Booker,
543
U.S. 220 (2005). The district court therefore asks us to vacate Olson's sentence and remand for
resentencing. In their responses to the district court's statement, both Olson and the government
ask us to vacate Olson's sentence and remand for resentencing. Therefore, we VACATE Olson's
sentence and REMAND for resentencing.