Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 05, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 5, 2007 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge Hon. Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge No. 06-4266 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 05 CR 30015 ANTHONY WOMACK, also known as David R. Herndon, BIGMAN, also known as BIGS, Judge. Defendant-Appellant. ORDER On August 17,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 5, 2007 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge Hon. Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge No. 06-4266 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 05 CR 30015 ANTHONY WOMACK, also known as David R. Herndon, BIGMAN, also known as BIGS, Judge. Defendant-Appellant. ORDER On August 17, 2..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 October 5, 2007 Before Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge Hon. Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge Hon. Diane S. Sykes, Circuit Judge No. 06-4266 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 05 CR 30015 ANTHONY WOMACK, also known as David R. Herndon, BIGMAN, also known as BIGS, Judge. Defendant-Appellant. ORDER On August 17, 2007, defendant-appellant filed a petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc in connection with the above-referenced case. No judge in active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc and all of the judges on the original panel have voted to deny rehearing. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion released on August 3, 2007, in connection with the above-referenced case, is amended as follows: Page 2, the first sentence of the first paragraph should read: “The jury convicted Womack of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, finding by special verdict that the amount of cocaine was in excess of five kilograms.”
