Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Feb. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 3, 2009 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK , Chief Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE , Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 08-1363 Appeal from the United PARVEEN IDRIS, et al. , States District Court for the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 06 C 6085 C ITY OF C HICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al., Robert W. Gettleman, Judge. Defendants-Appellees. Order The opinion issued on
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 3, 2009 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK , Chief Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE , Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 08-1363 Appeal from the United PARVEEN IDRIS, et al. , States District Court for the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 06 C 6085 C ITY OF C HICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al., Robert W. Gettleman, Judge. Defendants-Appellees. Order The opinion issued on ..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 3, 2009 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK , Chief Judge KENNETH F. RIPPLE , Circuit Judge ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge No. 08-1363 Appeal from the United PARVEEN IDRIS, et al. , States District Court for the Plaintiffs-Appellants, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 06 C 6085 C ITY OF C HICAGO, ILLINOIS, et al., Robert W. Gettleman, Judge. Defendants-Appellees. Order The opinion issued on January 5, 2009, is amended as follows: 1. The sentence at slip op. 2, lines 9-10, which originally read “The district court held otherwise and entered summary judgment for the defendants.”, is changed to: “The district court held otherwise and dismissed the complaint.” 2. The sentence at slip op. 5 lines 19-21, which originally read “The district court dismissed without prejudice all state-law claims, so that plaintiffs may pursue them in state court.”, is changed to: “The district court dismissed without prejudice the claim under state law that Chicago’s program is unauthorized or conflicts with a state statute, so that this line of argument may be renewed in state court.”
