Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Aug. 24, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted July 16, 2010 Decided August 24, 2010 Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge JOHN D. TINDER, Circuit Judge No. 07-4006 AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC., Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 04 C 7806 NATIONAL FOOTB
Summary: NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted July 16, 2010 Decided August 24, 2010 Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge JOHN D. TINDER, Circuit Judge No. 07-4006 AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC., Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff-Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 04 C 7806 NATIONAL FOOTBA..
More
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Submitted July 16, 2010 Decided August 24, 2010 Before MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge JOHN D. TINDER, Circuit Judge No. 07‐4006 AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC., Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellant, Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 04 C 7806 NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. James B. Moran, Judge. O R D E R On May 24, 2010, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded our decision in this case, American Needle, Inc. v. National Football, et al., 130 S. Ct. 2201 (2010). A certified copy of the Supreme Court’s opinion was filed with this court on June 25, 2010. Pursuant to Circuit Rule 54, the parties in this case filed their statements of positions as No. 07-4006 Page 2 to the action which ought to be taken by this court on remand. All parties requested that this case be remanded to the district court. On consideration of the position statements, we order this case REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion in American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, et al., 130 S. Ct. 2201 (2010).
