Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Julio Leija-Sanchez, 09-2672 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Number: 09-2672 Visitors: 4
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: May 21, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 May 21, 2010 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, District Judge* No. 09-2672 Appeal from the United UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, States District Court for the Plaintiff-Appellant, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 07 CR 224 JULIO LEIJA-SANCHEZ, Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Judge. Defendant-Appellee. Order The opinion of this court issued on April
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 May 21, 2010 Before FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, District Judge* No. 09-2672 Appeal from the United UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, States District Court for the Plaintiff-Appellant, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. v. No. 07 CR 224 JULIO LEIJA-SANCHEZ, Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Judge. Defendant-Appellee. Order The opinion of this court issued on April 8, 2010, is amended as follows: Page 9, full paragraph, change the two sentences that start on line 5 and end on line 11 to read, “Three of Leija-Sanchez’s co-defendants were apprehended in Mexico, which agreed to extradite them to the United States to face all of the indictment’s substantive charges, including arranging for Montes’s murder. The United States promised Mexico that it would not seek or impose the death penalty on any defendant in the case; Mexico was satisfied with that undertaking and saw no reason why the United States should not apply its substantive rules.” Defendant-appellee filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on April 22, 2010. No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all of the judges on the panel have voted to deny rehearing. The petition for rehearing is therefore DENIED. * Of the Northern District of Indiana, sitting by designation.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer