Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

16860 (1962)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16860 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 09, 1962
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 308 F.2d 452 STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant, v. FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and admitted to do business in the State of Nebraska, Appellee. No. 16860. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. Oct. 9, 1962. Fred J. Patz, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellant and Sterling F. Mutz, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief. F. B.
More

308 F.2d 452

STATE SECURITIES COMPANY, a corporation organized under the
laws of the State of Nebraska, Appellant,
v.
FEDERATED MUTUAL IMPLEMENT AND HARDWARE INSURANCE COMPANY, a
corporation organized under the laws of the State
of Minnesota, and admitted to do
business in the State of
Nebraska, Appellee.

No. 16860.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1962.

Fred J. Patz, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellant and Sterling F. Mutz, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief.

F. B. Baylor, Lincoln, Neb., made argument for the appellee and Baylor, Evnen, Baylor & Urbom by F. B. Baylor, Lincoln, Neb., was on the brief.

Before SANBORN and BLACKMUN, Circuit Judges, and REGISTER, District judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

We affirm the judgment for the defendant (appellee) in this diversity case governed by Nebraska law and tried to Judge John W. Delehant without a jury. He has wtitten an exhaustive opinion, reported in D.C., 204 F. Supp. 207, to which we can add nothing. that opinion and that briefs of the parties have convinced us that the judgment appealed from represents, at the very least, a permissible conclusion with respect to a doubtful question of Nebraska law, which this Court will not reverse. Homolla v. Gluck, 8 Cir., 248 F.2d 731, 733; Weiby v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 8 Cir., 273 F.2d 327, 331; Village of Brooten v. Cudahy Packing Company, 8 Cir., 291 F.2d 284, 301.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer