Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ak-Sar-Ben Pizza Hut, Etc. v. State of Nebraska Department of Roads, 73-1028 (1973)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 73-1028 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 18, 1973
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 476 F.2d 1283 AK-SAR-BEN PIZZA HUT, etc., et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS, Appellees. No. 73-1028. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 18, 1973. Decided May 18, 1973. Royce N. Harper, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, Neb., for appellants. D. Nick Caporale, Omaha, Neb., for appellees. Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and LAY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 BY THE COURT. 2 Upon due consideration of the proceedings in the district court, the
More

476 F.2d 1283

AK-SAR-BEN PIZZA HUT, etc., et al., Appellants,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF ROADS, Appellees.

No. 73-1028.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1973.
Decided May 18, 1973.

Royce N. Harper, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, Neb., for appellants.

D. Nick Caporale, Omaha, Neb., for appellees.

Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, and LAY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

BY THE COURT.

2

Upon due consideration of the proceedings in the district court, the briefs of the parties and argument of counsel, the court is convinced that the district court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action in that there was not a substantial federal question involved and no other basis for federal jurisdiction. Accordingly, the judgment granting the temporary injunction is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to the district court to forthwith vacate the temporary injunction and dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction. Our mandate shall issue immediately.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer