Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

81-2036 (1981)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 81-2036 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 18, 1981
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 668 F.2d 349 Durl F. ANDERSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA; Governor Charles Thone; Paul L. Douglas, Attorney General; Judge Joseph Martin; Mary E. Anderson, wife; Vincent Dowding, attorney; Thomas A. Wagoner, attorney; John Wolf, attorney; John Doe and Jane Doe, and any unknown others to be added as they become known, Appellees. No. 81-2036. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 15, 1981. Decided Dec. 18, 1981. Durl F. Anderson, pro se. Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McM
More

668 F.2d 349

Durl F. ANDERSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF NEBRASKA; Governor Charles Thone; Paul L. Douglas,
Attorney General; Judge Joseph Martin; Mary E. Anderson,
wife; Vincent Dowding, attorney; Thomas A. Wagoner,
attorney; John Wolf, attorney; John Doe and Jane Doe, and
any unknown others to be added as they become known, Appellees.

No. 81-2036.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 15, 1981.
Decided Dec. 18, 1981.

Durl F. Anderson, pro se.

Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appellant Durl F. Anderson, dissatisfied with the progress of his marriage dissolution proceedings in state court, attempted to remove the matter to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), the federal district court remanded the proceedings to state court and the appellant appeals. Various defendants move to dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction. Based on the well-reasoned opinion of the district court and on this court's opinion in Milligan v. Milligan, 484 F.2d 446 (8th Cir. 1973), the motion to dismiss should be, and hereby is, granted.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer