Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In Re North Little Rock School District and Its Board of Directors, 84-1830 (1984)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 84-1830 Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 06, 1984
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 739 F.2d 317 In re NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT and its Board of Directors, Petitioners. No. 84-1830. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. July 6, 1984. Before ROSS, ARNOLD and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The Petition, Amended Petition, and Second Amended Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, have been carefully considered. Petitioners argue that fundamental fairness requires issuance of the writ. 2 The extraordinary writ of mandamus issues only in exceptional circumstance
More

739 F.2d 317

In re NORTH LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT and its Board of
Directors, Petitioners.

No. 84-1830.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

July 6, 1984.

Before ROSS, ARNOLD and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The Petition, Amended Petition, and Second Amended Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, have been carefully considered. Petitioners argue that fundamental fairness requires issuance of the writ.

2

The extraordinary writ of mandamus issues only in exceptional circumstances amounting to a judicial usurpation of power. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S. Ct. 188, 190, 66 L. Ed. 2d 193 (1980); Sperry Rand Corporation v. Larson, 554 F.2d 868, 872 (8th Cir.). Petitioners have made no effort to demonstrate that the district court's actions have so exceeded its discretion as to be a usurpation of power. Petitioners have totally failed to sustain their heavy burden to justify issuance of the writ. The petitions for writ of mandamus are denied.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer