Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Enrique Cruz-Ochoa, 95-3393 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 95-3393 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 09, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 85 F.3d 325 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Enrique CRUZ-OCHOA, Appellant. No. 95-3393. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 27, 1996. Decided May 9, 1996. JUDGMENT 1 The above-entitled case is set for oral argument as the third case on Tuesday, March 12, 1996. It is hereby ORDERED: 2 1) The case be stricken from the calendar and dismissed. 3 2) Our review of the sentencing transcript and record before us leads us to conclude that the district court erred as a ma
More

85 F.3d 325

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Enrique CRUZ-OCHOA, Appellant.

No. 95-3393.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 27, 1996.
Decided May 9, 1996.

JUDGMENT

1

The above-entitled case is set for oral argument as the third case on Tuesday, March 12, 1996. It is hereby ORDERED:

2

1) The case be stricken from the calendar and dismissed.

3

2) Our review of the sentencing transcript and record before us leads us to conclude that the district court erred as a matter of law by incorrectly believing that it could not depart downward from the guidelines on the basis of defendant's waiver and consent to administrative deportation upon the filing of a joint motion by the parties for a two-level downward departure at sentencing on defendant's plea of guilty to illegal re-entry.

4

3) The sentence is vacated and the case remanded for resentencing, so that the district court may consider whether departure is warranted. Whether a downward departure should be granted lies within the sound discretion of the district court. See U.S. v. Whitetail, 956 F.2d 857 (8th Cir.1992).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer