Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

96-2388 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-2388 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 27, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 103 F.3d 135 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Charles Gordon LONG, Appellant, v. Ann BARRY, individually and as Commissioner of the Department of Health; Frank Wood, Indivi
More

103 F.3d 135

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Charles Gordon LONG, Appellant,
v.
Ann BARRY, individually and as Commissioner of the
Department of Health; Frank Wood, Individually and as
Commissioner of Department of Corrections; Dana
Baumgartner, Individually and as Health Services Director of
the Department of Corrections; Dennis Benson, Individually
and as Warden of the Minnesota Correctional Facility at
Stillwater; Angelito Ramos, Dr., Individually and as Chief
Medical Officer of the Minnesota Correctional Facility at
Stillwater, Appellees.

No. 96-2388.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: October 22, 1996
Filed: November 27, 1996

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Charles Gordon Long brought this action against a physician and four state officials, claiming constitutional and state law violations, after his prescription pain medication was withheld from him during his pretrial detention at a state correctional facility. The four state officials moved for summary judgment, the district court1 granted the motion, and Long appeals.

2

The order granting summary judgment to four of the five defendants was not a final, appealable order, and we therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

1

The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer