Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

96-2200 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-2200 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 30, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 112 F.3d 513 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Timothy Edward HOLZ, Appellant, v. Gary GRIMES, Appellee. Timothy Edward HOLZ, Appellant, v. Gary GRIMES, Appellee. Timothy Ed
More

112 F.3d 513

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Timothy Edward HOLZ, Appellant,
v.
Gary GRIMES, Appellee.
Timothy Edward HOLZ, Appellant,
v.
Gary GRIMES, Appellee.
Timothy Edward HOLZ, Appellant,
v.
Gary GRIMES; Officer Hammond, Sebastian County Detention
Center Deputy; Officer Cox, Sebastian County
Detention Center Deputy, Appellees.

No. 96-2200.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 23, 1997.
Decided April 30, 1997.

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Timothy Edward Holz, an Arkansas inmate, appeals the district court's1 judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions following a bench trial. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court's judgment was correct for the reasons stated in its thorough memorandum opinion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Holz's motion for a writ of mandamus.

1

The Honorable Beverly R. Stites, United State Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer