Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Samuel Hernandez v. Railroad Retirement Board, 96-3119 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-3119 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 10, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 105 F.3d 662 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Samuel HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent. No. 96-3119. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Ci
More

105 F.3d 662

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Samuel HERNANDEZ, Petitioner,
v.
RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

No. 96-3119.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1997.

Petition for Review of the Decision of the Railroad Retirement Board.

R.R.B.

AFFIRMED.

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Samuel Hernandez petitions this court for review of the final decision of the Railroad Retirement Board that he is no longer entitled to have his annuity calculated under the special guaranty provision of the Railroad Retirement Act. 45 U.S.C. § 231b(f)(3). We find no error of law and conclude the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer