Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Anthony Roberson v. Judge Porter, Jr. Michael O. Freeman, Prosecutor Hennepin County Government Center State of Minnesota, 96-3966 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-3966 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 14, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 129 F.3d 122 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Joseph Anthony ROBERSON, Appellant, v. Judge PORTER, Jr.; Michael O. Freeman, Prosecutor; Hennepin County Government Center; S
More

129 F.3d 122

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Joseph Anthony ROBERSON, Appellant,
v.
Judge PORTER, Jr.; Michael O. Freeman, Prosecutor;
Hennepin County Government Center; State of
Minnesota, Appellees.

No. 96-3966.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 14, 1997.
Submitted Oct. 7, 1997.
Filed Nov. 14, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, and McMILLIAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Joseph Anthony Roberson appeals from the final order of the United States District Court1 for the District of Minnesota, dismissing Roberson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a state judge, prosecutor, government building, and the State of Minnesota. We have carefully reviewed the entire record, and we conclude the district court did not err in dismissing this action. In addition, Roberson is responsible for the filing fee in the district court and on appeal. See In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529-30 (8th Cir.1997) (prisoner is responsible for filing fee at moment of filing civil action or appeal).

2

Accordingly, we affirm. Roberson's motions on appeal are denied.

1

The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer