Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

96-4268 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-4268 Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 27, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 116 F.3d 1484 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians; Arthur Gahbow; Walter Sutton; Carleen Benjamin; Joseph Dunkley; Plaintiffs, and United S
More

116 F.3d 1484

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians; Arthur Gahbow; Walter
Sutton; Carleen Benjamin; Joseph Dunkley; Plaintiffs,
and
United States of America; Intervenor-Plaintiff,
and
St. Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin; Lac Du Flambeau
Band of Lake Superior Chippewas; Bad River Band of Lake
Superior Chippewa Indians; Lac Courte Oreilles Band of
States Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin;
Sokaogan Chippewa Community; Red Cliff Band of Lake
Superior Chippewa; Intervenors-Plaintiffs,
v.
State of Minnesota; Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources; Defendants,
and
County of Aitkin; County of Benton; County of Sherburne;
Cty. of Crow Wing; County of Isanti; County of Kanabec;
County of Mille Lacs; County of Morrison; County of Pine;
Intervenors-Defendants,
Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa Indians; Robert Peacock;
Peter Defoe; Clifton Rabideaux; Herman Wise;
George Dupuis; Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Arne Carlson, Governor of Minnesota; Rodney Sando,
Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources; Raymond B. Hitchcock, Assistant Commissioner of
Operations Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; Defendants,
and
County of Aitkin; County of Benton; County of Sherburne;
Cty. of Crow Wing; County of Isanti; County of Kanabec;
County of Mille Lacs; County of Morrison; County of Pine;
Movants-Appellants.
Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians; Arthur Gahbow; Walter
Sutton; Carleen Benjamin; Joseph Dunkley; Plaintiffs,
and
United States of America; St. Croix Chippewa Indians of
Wisconsin; Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewas;
Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians; Lac
Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of
Wisconsin; Sokaogan Chippewa Community; Red Cliff Band of
Lake Superior Chippewa; Intervenors-Plaintiffs,
v.
State of Minnesota; Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources; Defendants,
and
County of Aitkin; County of Benton; County of Sherburne;
Cty. of Crow Wing; County of Isanti; County of Kanabec;
County of Mille Lacs; County of Morrison; County of Pine;
Intervenors-Defendants,
Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa Indians; Robert Peacock;
Peter Defoe; Clifton Rabideaux; Herman Wise;
George Dupuis; Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Arne Carlson, Governor of Minnesota; Rodney Sando,
Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources; Raymond B. Hitchcock, Assistant Commissioner of
Operations Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; Defendants,
and
John W. Thompson; Jenny Thompson; Glenn Thompson; Joseph
Karpen; Leroy Burling; Gary Kiedrowski;
Movants-Appellants.

Nos. 96-4268, 96-4277.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 12, 1997.
Filed June 27, 1997.

Before McMILLIAN, LAY, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

1

Thompson, Jenny Thompson, Joseph N. Karpen, Leroy Burling, Glenn E. Thompson, and Gary M. Kierdrowski petition the district court to intervene in Fond du Lac Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. Carlson, et al., Civ. No. 5-92-159, which has been consolidated with Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. Minnesota, et al., Civ. No. 3-94-1226. The district court denied leave to intervene on the ground that the petitions were not timely filed. This appeal followed.

2

Upon review of the briefs and records we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners' motion to intervene. We affirm the order of the district court. We make note, however, that this order is without prejudice to the petitioners should they file a timely petition in the district court in any further proceedings that might encompass the subject matter of the aforementioned litigation.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

A true copy.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer