Filed: Nov. 26, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1275 _ Carmen C. Reul, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for * the District of Minnesota. Manpower International, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _ Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Carmen C. Reul appeals from a summary judgment entered by the District Court1 in favor of Manpower International, Inc., a temporary
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1275 _ Carmen C. Reul, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for * the District of Minnesota. Manpower International, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _ Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Carmen C. Reul appeals from a summary judgment entered by the District Court1 in favor of Manpower International, Inc., a temporary e..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-1275 _____________ Carmen C. Reul, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United v. * States District Court for * the District of Minnesota. Manpower International, Inc., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _____________ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _____________ Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM. Carmen C. Reul appeals from a summary judgment entered by the District Court1 in favor of Manpower International, Inc., a temporary employment agency and the defendant in Reul's action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Having reviewed the case, we are satisfied the District Court properly concluded that Reul failed to come forward with sufficient evidence to create a question of fact as to whether Manpower's legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for 1 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. not placing her in any positions were a pretext for unlawful discrimination. Summary judgment thus was correctly entered. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
