Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. John Gregory Lambros, 97-1553 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-1553 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 02, 1997
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 124 F.3d 209 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John Gregory LAMBROS, Appellant. No. 97-1553. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Ci
More

124 F.3d 209

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
John Gregory LAMBROS, Appellant.

No. 97-1553.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: August 7, 1997.
Filed: September 2, 1997.

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The court previously vacated a life-imprisonment sentence imposed on John Gregory Lambros following his conviction for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and § 846. See United States v. Lambros, 65 F.3d 698 (8th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 796 (1996). On resentencing, Lambros moved for a downward departure from the applicable Guidelines range, arguing that his affliction with Hepatitis C has increased the chances of his contracting liver cancer or cirrhosis of the liver. The district court1 denied Lambros's motion and sentenced him to 360 months' imprisonment and eight years' supervised release. This appeal followed, in which Lambros challenges the denial of his motion.

2

Based upon our review of the record, including the court's statement that it found "no reason to depart" from the applicable Guidelines, we conclude that the court was aware of its authority to depart downward under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5H1.4, p.s. (1995) and made a discretionary decision not to do so; thus, the denial of Lambros's motion is unreviewable on appeal. See United States v. Fischl, 16 F.3d 927, 929 (8th Cir.1994).

3

The judgment is affirmed.

1

The Honorable Robert G. Renner, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer