Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

97-2312 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-2312 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 26, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 141 F.3d 1168 125 Ed. Law Rep. 622 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Kenneth E. HAWLEY; Margaret R. Hawley, Appellants, v. Donald NELSON; Teresa Winemiller; Caroline Bradfor
More

141 F.3d 1168

125 Ed. Law Rep. 622

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Kenneth E. HAWLEY; Margaret R. Hawley, Appellants,
v.
Donald NELSON; Teresa Winemiller; Caroline Bradford; Kaye
Harms; Roger Berkbuegler; Carl James; Wayne Langston;
Russell Sheldon; Charlene Wheeler; John W. Wiggins; Mary
W. Sheffield; Russell Carnahan; Ralph Haslag; Lynn
Slawson; Kent King; Melvin E. Carnahan; Roger A. Carnahan;
William E. Hickle; Douglas E. Long, Appellees,
CIRCUIT COURT OF PHELPS COUNTY, Associate Division, Defendant,
UNNAMED EMPLOYEE(S) OF THE ROLLA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, Appellees.

No. 97-2312.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: March 20, 1998.
Filed: March 26, 1998.

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Kenneth E. Hawley and Margaret R. Hawley appeal the district court's1 dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against numerous defendants. The Hawleys' complaint centers around the custody of the Hawleys' two minor sons, Joshua and Caleb, and actions taken by defendant juvenile officers, school officials, foster parents, and judges. After de novo review, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its memorandum and order. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.

2

A true copy.

1

The Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer