Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

97-3884 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-3884 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 07, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 141 F.3d 1168 NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well. Hezile Shabazz EARL; Plaintiff-Appellant, Judy Kae EARL; Tori Lee Allwhite, minor, by her next parent, Hezile Shabazz Earl an
More

141 F.3d 1168

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
Hezile Shabazz EARL; Plaintiff-Appellant,
Judy Kae EARL; Tori Lee Allwhite, minor, by her next
parent, Hezile Shabazz Earl and Judy Kae Earl, Plaintiffs,
v.
Darrell TURNER, Des Arc Police Officer; Leon Moon, Chief of
Police Des Arc; Roger Scott, Des Arc City Mayor; Bob
Johnson, Prairie County Sheriff; Chris Ralston, Des Arc
City Police; Raymond Coffman, Prairie County Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-3884EA.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 2, 1998.
Filed: April 7, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Hezile Shabazz Earl, his wife, and their daughter filed suit in the district court claiming violations of their civil rights. When they failed to appear at trial, the district court dismissed the suit with prejudice. Earl appeals. After careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Pardee v. Stock, 712 F.2d 1290, 1291-92 (8th Cir.1983) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer