Filed: Nov. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-1106 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Francisco Barraza-Canizales, also * District of Nebraska. known as Poncho, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 4, 1998 Filed: November 9, 1998 _ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Francisco Barraza-Canizales appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court1 following his g
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-1106 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Francisco Barraza-Canizales, also * District of Nebraska. known as Poncho, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 4, 1998 Filed: November 9, 1998 _ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Francisco Barraza-Canizales appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court1 following his gu..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-1106
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Francisco Barraza-Canizales, also * District of Nebraska.
known as Poncho, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: November 4, 1998
Filed: November 9, 1998
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Francisco Barraza-Canizales appeals from the sentence imposed by the district
court1 following his guilty plea to distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21
U.S.C. ยง 841(a)(1). The court sentenced Barraza-Canizales at the bottom of the
applicable Guidelines range to 63 months& imprisonment and five years& supervised
release. After appellate counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
386 U.S. 738 (1967), we granted Barraza-Canizales permission to file a pro se
supplemental brief, but he has not done so.
Our review of the record reveals the existence of no nonfrivolous issues. See
Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988).
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel&s motion to withdraw is granted.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-