Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Barraza-Canizales, 98-1106 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-1106 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 09, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-1106 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Francisco Barraza-Canizales, also * District of Nebraska. known as Poncho, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: November 4, 1998 Filed: November 9, 1998 _ Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Francisco Barraza-Canizales appeals from the sentence imposed by the district court1 following his g
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                             FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 98-1106
                                    ___________

United States of America,              *
                                       *
            Appellee,                  *
                                       *
      v.                               * Appeal from the United States
                                       * District Court for the
Francisco Barraza-Canizales, also      * District of Nebraska.
known as Poncho,                       *    [UNPUBLISHED]
                                       *
            Appellant.                 *
                                  ___________

                            Submitted: November 4, 1998

                                Filed: November 9, 1998
                                    ___________

Before WOLLMAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Francisco Barraza-Canizales appeals from the sentence imposed by the district
court1 following his guilty plea to distributing methamphetamine in violation of 21
U.S.C. ยง 841(a)(1). The court sentenced Barraza-Canizales at the bottom of the
applicable Guidelines range to 63 months& imprisonment and five years& supervised
release. After appellate counsel moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California,

      1
      The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.

386 U.S. 738
(1967), we granted Barraza-Canizales permission to file a pro se
supplemental brief, but he has not done so.

     Our review of the record reveals the existence of no nonfrivolous issues. See
Penson v. Ohio, 
488 U.S. 75
, 80 (1988).

      The judgment is affirmed. Counsel&s motion to withdraw is granted.

      A true copy.

            Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer