Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Mark W. Hamilton, 98-1541 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-1541 Visitors: 293
Filed: Jun. 15, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-1541NE _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Mark W. Hamilton, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 9, 1998 Filed: June 15, 1998 _ Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mark W. Hamilton appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation and denying Hamilton's motion for dismissal
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                  _____________

                                  No. 98-1541NE
                                  _____________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
                   Appellee,            * Appeal from the United States
                                        * District Court for the District
      v.                                * of Nebraska.
                                        *
Mark W. Hamilton,                       *       [UNPUBLISHED]
                                        *
                   Appellant.           *
                                  _____________

                            Submitted: June 9, 1998
                                Filed: June 15, 1998
                                 _____________

Before FAGG, BRIGHT, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
                           _____________

PER CURIAM.

       Mark W. Hamilton appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate
judge's recommendation and denying Hamilton's motion for dismissal of the indictment
on double jeopardy grounds. Having considered the parties' submissions, we are
satisfied the district court committed no error of law and the motion to dismiss was
correctly denied. Hamilton's arguments are foreclosed by this court's decision in
Walker v. Rushing, 
898 F.2d 672
(8th Cir. 1990). We thus affirm the district court.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.

      Attest:

               CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                              -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer