Filed: Dec. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2309 _ Ernest Sam Kojo-Kwarteng, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Washington University; Washington * Eastern District of Missouri. University Police Department; Denise * Doner; Robert Browning; Otha * [UNPUBLISHED] Overholt, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 7, 1998 Filed: December 16, 1998 _ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURI
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-2309 _ Ernest Sam Kojo-Kwarteng, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Washington University; Washington * Eastern District of Missouri. University Police Department; Denise * Doner; Robert Browning; Otha * [UNPUBLISHED] Overholt, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 7, 1998 Filed: December 16, 1998 _ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIA..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-2309 ___________ Ernest Sam Kojo-Kwarteng, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Washington University; Washington * Eastern District of Missouri. University Police Department; Denise * Doner; Robert Browning; Otha * [UNPUBLISHED] Overholt, * * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: December 7, 1998 Filed: December 16, 1998 ___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Ernest Sam Kojo-Kwarteng appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Eastern District of Missouri granting summary judgment in favor 1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. of his former employer, Washington University, in Kwarteng&s employment discrimination suit. Upon a thorough review of the record and the parties& briefs, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was warranted. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
